The New York Times bestseller! More than two dozen psychiatrists and psychologists offer their consensus view that Trump's mental state presents a clear and present danger to our nation and individual well-being.
This is not normal.
Since the start of Donald Trump’s presidential run, one question has quietly but urgently permeated the observations of concerned citizens: What is wrong with him? Constrained by the American Psychiatric Association’s “Goldwater rule,” which inhibits mental health professionals from diagnosing public figures they have not personally examined, many of those qualified to answer this question have shied away from discussing the issue at all. The public has thus been left to wonder whether he is mad, bad, or both.
In THE DANGEROUS CASE OF DONALD TRUMP, twenty-seven psychiatrists, psychologists, and other mental health experts argue that, in Mr. Trump’s case, their moral and civic “duty to warn” America supersedes professional neutrality. They then explore Trump’s symptoms and potentially relevant diagnoses to find a complex, if also dangerously mad, man.
Philip Zimbardo and Rosemary Sword, for instance, explain Trump’s impulsivity in terms of “unbridled and extreme present hedonism.” Craig Malkin writes on pathological narcissism and politics as a lethal mix. Gail Sheehy, on a lack of trust that exceeds paranoia. Lance Dodes, on sociopathy. Robert Jay Lifton, on the “malignant normality” that can set in everyday life if psychiatrists do not speak up.
His madness is catching, too. From the trauma people have experienced under the Trump administration to the cult-like characteristics of his followers, he has created unprecedented mental health consequences across our nation and beyond.
It’s not all in our heads. It’s in his.
"There will not be a book published this fall more urgent, important, or controversial than The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump...profound, illuminating and discomforting" Bill Moyers
|Publisher:||St. Martin's Press|
|Product dimensions:||6.10(w) x 9.30(h) x 1.40(d)|
About the Author
Bandy X. Lee, M.D., M.Div., is Assistant Clinical Professor in Law and Psychiatry at Yale School of Medicine. She earned her degrees at Yale, interned at Bellevue, was Chief Resident at Mass General, and was a Research Fellow at Harvard Medical School. She was also a Fellow of the National Institute of Mental Health. She worked in several maximum-security prisons, cofounded Yale’s Violence and Health Study Group, and leads a violence prevention collaborators group for the World Health Organization. She’s written more than 100 peer-reviewed articles and chapters, edited several academic books, and is author of the textbook Violence.
Read an Excerpt
UNBRIDLED AND EXTREME PRESENT HEDONISM
How the Leader of the Free World Has Proven Time and Again He Is Unfit for Duty
PHILIP ZIMBARDO AND ROSEMARY SWORD
In the summer of 2015, we commenced what would become an ongoing discussion about Donald Trump. He had just thrown his hat in the ring as a Republican presidential candidate, and our initial conversation was brief: he was in it for the publicity. For us, as for many Americans, Donald Trump had been in the periphery of our consciousness for years, first as a well-publicized New York City businessman and later as a mediocre television personality. And like most, we didn't take him seriously. Why would we have? He had no political experience, and he failed to show any real interest in philanthropy, much less in helping the American people or non-Trump businesses. His products were made outside the United States, and multiple lawsuits indicated he didn't pay those small businesses that supplied him with goods and services. He had also created Trump University, for people who wanted to get certified in business administration, at a fee of $43,000 for one year. It was a scam — the same lessons were available online for free for anyone, and the mentors who were supposed to give students personal guidance were rarely available. Students who took Trump University to court won their lawsuits, and Trump U got dumped. Simply put, Donald Trump was a businessman interested primarily in personal gain, sometimes using unscrupulous methods.
We also knew that, for decades, Trump had flip-flopped, switching political parties — first a Democrat, then a member of the Reform Party, then a Republican, then a Democrat, and finally a Republican again. Surely, it seemed, "The Donald" was in the running merely to gain media coverage, to place himself in a better position to make even more big deals and to up-level his product line: Donald J. Trump.
Then, as the months progressed, we became increasingly concerned that, given his "straightforward" or "outsider" presentation and his charisma, he would appeal to people who were unaware of the dangers of narcissism in extremis, or of the offensive behaviors that can accompany it. While we are not trying to diagnose here (which would be close to impossible in any case), we would like to call the reader's attention to associated behaviors that include but are not limited to condescension, gross exaggeration (lying), bullying, jealousy, fragile self- esteem, lack of compassion, and viewing the world through an "us-vs.-them" lens. Having observed the schoolyard bully tactics Trump employed during the Republican debates, and his absurdly boastful presentation during interviews, we felt it was important to raise awareness about this set of behaviors. So, in January 2016, we published an online Psychology Today column about bullies and the hostile social environments they create in schools and businesses (Sword and Zimbardo 2016a).
As Trump's campaign, and his narcissism, gained momentum, so did our efforts to make people aware of the potential dangers he posed for our democracy. In March 2016 we published a column about the narcissistic personality (Sword and Zimbardo 2016b). In it, we shared clinically documented narcissistic behaviors, hoping it would be easy for readers to come to their own conclusions that Trump fit every example. We did not mention his numerous romantic dalliances, or the growing number of sexual harassment lawsuits he faced, or his three marriages, in which he traded up for younger, more beautiful women. Each of these, on its own, is not exceptional, but it doesn't take a mental health professional to determine that these behaviors, coupled with his ever- shifting political party affiliations (changes that could be viewed as having been made to bolster his image and ego), indicated that this person's main focus was self-interest, and were incongruent with one important character trait the American people have come to appreciate in their president — at least up until November 2016: stability.
Furthermore, through our observations, it was glaringly apparent, based on Zimbardo's time perspective theory (Zimbardo and Boyd 2009), later developed into time perspective therapy by Sword and Sword (Zimbardo, Sword, and Sword 2012), that Trump embodied a specific personality type: an unbridled, or extreme, present hedonist. As the words suggest, present hedonists live in the present moment, without much thought of any consequences of their actions or of the future. An extreme present hedonist will say whatever it takes to pump up his ego and to assuage his inherent low self- esteem, without any thought for past reality or for the potentially devastating future outcomes from off-the-cuff remarks or even major decisions. Trump's behavior indicates that his time perspectives are totally unbalanced. It's not necessary for him to take the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (either the long or short forms) in order for us to come to this conclusion. Our assertion that Trump qualifies as among the most extreme present hedonists we have ever witnessed comes from the plethora of written and recorded material on him, including all his interviews, hundreds of hours of video, and his own tweets on his every personal feeling.
What follows is meant to help readers understand how we've come to the conclusion that Donald Trump displays the most threatening time perspective profile, that of an extreme present hedonist, and is therefore "unfit for duty."
Time Perspective Theory and Time Perspective Therapy (TPT)
We are all familiar with the three main time zones: the past, the present, and the future. In TPT, these time zones are divided into subsets: past positive and past negative, present hedonism and present fatalism, and future positive and future negative. When one of these time perspectives is weighed too heavily, we can lose out on what's really happening now and/or lose sight of what could happen in our future. This can cause us to be unsteady, unbalanced, or temporally biased.
Being out of balance in this way also shades the way we think, and negatively impacts our daily decision making. For instance, if you are stuck in a past negative experience, you might think that from now on everything that happens to you will be negative. Why even bother planning for your future? you might think. It's just going to continue to be same old bad stuff. Or, if you are an extreme present hedonist adrenaline junky intent on spiking your adrenal glands, then you might engage in risky behaviors that unintentionally endanger you or others because you are living in the moment and not thinking about the future consequences of today's actions. If you are out of balance in your future time perspective, constantly thinking and worrying about all the things you have on your endless to-do list, you might forget about or miss out on the everyday, wonderful things happening in your life and the lives of your loved ones in the here and now.
SIX MAIN TIME PERSPECTIVES IN TPT
1. Past positive people focus on the good things that have happened.
2. Past negative people focus on all the things that went wrong in the past.
3. Present hedonistic people live in the moment, seeking pleasure, novelty, and sensation, and avoiding pain.
4. Present fatalistic people feel that planning for future decisions is not necessary because predetermined fate plays the guiding role in one's life.
5. Future positive people plan for the future and trust that things will work out.
6. Future negative people feel the future is predetermined and apocalyptic, or they have no future orientation.
THREE MAIN TP BIASES
1. Past bias: Good and bad things happen to everyone. Some of us view the world through rose-colored glasses (past positive), whereas others see the world through a darker lens (past negative). We have found that people who focus primarily on the past value the old more than the new; the familiar over the novel; and the cautious, conservative approach over the daring, more liberal or riskier one.
2. Present bias: People who live in the present are far less, or not at all, influenced by either past experiences or future considerations. They focus only on the immediate present — what's happening now (present hedonism). Decisions are based on immediate stimulus: internal hormonal signals, feelings, smells, sounds, the attractive qualities of the object of desire, and what others are urging them to do. Present-biased people who are influenced by past negative experiences are likely to feel stuck in the mire of the past now (present fatalism).
3. Future bias: No one is born thinking about how to plan for the future. A number of conditions, including living in a temperate zone (where it's necessary to anticipate seasonal change), living in a stable family or stable economic/political society (where a person learns to trust promises made to him), and becoming educated, can create future-positive-oriented people. In general, future-oriented people do very well in life. They are less aggressive, are less depressed, have more energy, take care of their health, have good impulse control, and have more self-esteem. Those stuck in the past, and locked into negative memories, feel fatalistic about the present and may have lost the ability even to conceive of a hopeful future (future negative).
Healthy Versus Unhealthy Time Perspectives
Through years of research, we have discovered that people who live healthy, productive, optimistic lives share the following traits — what we call an "ideal time perspective":
High past positive/low past negative;
Low present fatalism/moderate selected present hedonism; and
Moderately high future-positive orientation.
Conversely, we have found that people with pessimistic time perspectives, usually due to trauma, depression, anxiety, stress, or posttraumatic stress, share the following time perspective profile:
High past negative/low past positive;
High present fatalism and/or high present hedonism; and
Low future/no future orientation.
Having a dose of selected present hedonism in one's overall time perspective profile is important because enjoying oneself and having fun is a healthy part of life. Yet, too much of a good thing can cause numerous problems.
Present Hedonism and Arrested Emotional Development
As just mentioned, present hedonists live and act in the moment, frequently with little to no thought of the future, or the consequences of their actions. Most children and teenagers are present hedonists. Each day, they build on past experiences, but their concept of the future is still under development. People suffering from arrested emotional development, usually caused by a childhood trauma, are also present hedonists. Without therapy, the ability to mature emotionally beyond the age of trauma is difficult to impossible. When they reach adulthood, they may be able to hide their lack of emotional maturity for periods, but then, when in a stressful situation, they revert to behaving the emotional age they were when they were first traumatized. Depending on the degree to which the childhood trauma affected the person suffering from arrested emotional development, they may find that, over time, their present-hedonistic time perspective has morphed into extreme present hedonism.
Without proper individual assessment, we can only make a best guess as to whether Donald Trump suffers from arrested emotional development, which may or may not be a factor in his extreme present hedonism. Yet, with access to the extensive amount of print and video media exposing his bullying behavior, his immature remarks about sex, and his childlike need for constant attention, we can speculate that the traumatizing event was when he was sent away to military school at the age of thirteen. According to one of his biographers, Michael D'Antonio, Trump "was essentially banished from the family home. He hadn't known anything but living with his family in a luxurious setting, and all of a sudden he's sent away" (Schwartzman and Miller 2016). This would help explain his pubescent default setting when confronted by others.
Extreme Present Hedonism
An extreme present hedonist will say or do anything at any time for purposes of self-aggrandizement and to shield himself from previous (usually negatively perceived) activities, with no thought of the future or the effect of his actions. Coupled with a measure of paranoia, which is the norm, extreme present hedonism is the most unpredictable and perilous time perspective due to its "action" component. Here's how it works: The extreme present hedonist's impulsive thought leads to an impulsive action that can cause him to dig in his heels when confronted with the consequences of that action. If the person is in a position of power, then others scramble either to deny or to find ways to back up the original impulsive action. In normal, day-to- day life, this impulsiveness leads to misunderstandings, lying, and toxic relationships. In the case of Donald Trump, an impulsive thought may unleash a stream of tweets or verbal remarks (the action), which then spur others to try to fulfill, or deny, his thoughtless action.
Case in point: Trump's impulsive tweet "How low has President Obama gone to tapp [sic] my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!" (Associated Press 2017) caused members of his staff to scramble to find evidence to make the false and slanderous claim "real." That one extreme present hedonistic tweet has led, ironically, to multiple investigations into the Trump campaign's possible Russian connections at the expense of taxpayers' hard-earned dollars.
Another concerning characteristic of extreme present hedonists is the often unwitting — we like to give some extreme present hedonists the benefit of the doubt — propensity to dehumanize others in order to feel superior. This lack of foresight and compassion is also a trait of narcissism and bullying, which we address later in this chapter.
Donald Trump's Extreme Present Hedonistic Quotes
It could be argued that almost anyone can be presented in a negative light when scrutinized or quoted out of context. However, when one runs for the highest office in the land, and then wins that prize, such scrutiny is expected. In the case of Donald Trump, a rich trove of recorded examples gives us a strong picture of the inner workings of his unbalanced psyche. The following well-known quotes, which we've organized into categories — some of them overlap multiple categories — compiled by Michael Kruse and Noah Weiland for Politico Magazine ("Donald Trump's Greatest Self Contradictions," May 5, 2016) illustrate his extreme present hedonistic penchant for off-roading from his script and/or saying or tweeting whatever pops into his mind, making things up, repeating fake news, or simply lying:
"Sometimes, part of making a deal is denigrating your competition" (The Art of the Deal, 1987).
"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best They're sending people that have a lot of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people" (Republican rally speech, June 16, 2015).
"Written by a nice reporter. Now the poor guy. You ought to see this guy" (remark made while contorting his face and moving his arms and hands around awkwardly, at a campaign rally in South Carolina, November 24, 2015, about journalist Serge Kovaleski, who has arthrogryposis, a congenital condition that can limit joint movement or lock limbs in place).
"Made in America? @BarackObama called his 'birthplace' Hawaii 'here in Asia'" (Twitter, November 18, 2011).
"I watched when the World Trade Center came tumbling down And I watched in Jersey City, New Jersey, where thousands and thousands of people were cheering as that building was comingdown. Thousands of people were cheering" (at a rally in Birmingham, Alabama, November 21, 2015). The next day, This Week host, George Stephanopoulos, pointed out that "the police say that didn't happen." Trump insisted otherwise: "It was on television. I saw it happen."
"In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally" (Twitter, November 27, 2016).
"You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes. Blood coming out of her — wherever" (remarks during CNN interview with regard to Megyn Kelly, following the previous night's Fox News debate co-moderated by Kelly in which Kelly asked Trump about his misogynistic treatment of women, August 7, 2015).
Excerpted from "The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump"
Copyright © 2017 Bandy X. Lee.
Excerpted by permission of St. Martin's Press.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Table of Contents
Foreword: Our Witness to Malignant Reality, by Robert Jay Lifton, M.D.
Prologue: Professions and Politics, by Judith Lewis Herman, M.D., and Bandy X. Lee, M.D., M.Div.
Introduction: Our Duty to Warn, by Bandy X. Lee, M.D., M.Div.
Part I. The Trump Phenomenon
Chapter 1. Unbridled and Extreme Present Hedonism: How the Leader of the Free World has Proven Time and Again He is Unfit for Duty, by Philip Zimbardo, Ph.D., and Rosemary Sword
Chapter 2. Pathological Narcissism and Politics: A Lethal Mix, by Craig Malkin, Ph.D.
Chapter 3. I Wrote ‘The Art of the Deal’ with Trump; His Self-Sabotage is Rooted in His Past, by Tony Schwartz
Chapter 4. Trump’s Trust Deficit Is the Core Problem, by Gail Sheehy, Ph.D.
Chapter 5. Sociopathy, by Lance Dodes, M.D.
Chapter 6. Donald Trump is: A) Bad; B) Mad; C) All of the Above, by John D. Gartner, Ph.D.
Chapter 7. Why ‘Crazy Like a Fox’ vs. ‘Crazy Like a Crazy’ Really Matters: Delusional Disorder, Admiration of Brutal Dictators, the Nuclear Codes and Trump, by Michael J. Tansey, Ph.D.
Chapter 8. Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, and the POTUS, by David M. Reiss, M.D.
Chapter 9. Donald J. Trump, Alleged Incapacitated Person: Mental Incapacity, the Electoral College, and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, by James A. Herb, M.A., Esq.
Part II. The Trump Dilemma
Chapter 10. Should Psychiatrists Refrain from Commenting on Trump’s Psychology?, by Leonard L. Glass, M.D., M.P.H.
Chapter 11. On Seeing What You See and Saying What You Know: A Psychiatrist’s Responsibility, by Henry J. Friedman, M.D.
Chapter 12. The Issue is Dangerousness, not Mental Illness, by James Gilligan, M.D.
Chapter 13. A Clinical Case for the Dangerousness of Donald J. Trump, by Diane Jhueck, L.M.H.C., D.M.H.P.
Chapter 14. Health, Risk, and the Duty to Protect the Community, by Howard H. Covitz, Ph.D., A.B.P.P.
Chapter 15. New Opportunities for Therapy in the Age of Trump, by William J. Doherty, Ph.D.
Part III. The Trump Effect
Chapter 16. Trauma, Time, Truth, and Trump: How a President Freezes Healing and Promotes Crisis, by Betty P. Teng, M.F.A., L.M.S.W.
Chapter 17. Trump Anxiety Disorder: The Trump Effect on the Mental Health of the Public Half the Nation and Special Populations, by Jennifer Contarino Panning, Psy.D.
Chapter 18. In Relationship with an Abusive President, by Harper West, M.A., L.L.P.
Chapter 19. Birtherism and the Deployment of the Trumpian Mindset, by Luba Kessler, M.D.
Chapter 20. Trump’s Daddy Issues: A Toxic Mix for America, by Steve Wruble, M.D.
Chapter 21. Trump and the American Collective Psyche, by Thomas Singer, M.D.
Chapter 22. Who Goes Trump? Tyranny as a Triumph of Narcissism, by Elizabeth Mika, M.A., L.C.P.C.
Chapter 23. The Loneliness of Fateful Decisions: Social Contexts and Psychological Vulnerability, by Edwin B. Fisher, Ph.D.
Chapter 24. He’s Got the World in His Hands and His Finger on the Trigger: The 25th Amendment Solution, by Nanette Gartrell, M.D., and Dee Mosbacher, M.D., Ph.D.
Epilogue: A Race to the End of the World and Its Remedy, by Noam Chomsky, Ph.D., with Bandy X. Lee, M.D., M.Div.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
All those people who voted for Trump should read this book. It is well written and presents a clear case why Donald Trump is so dangerous to our democracy. Trump does not have the intellectual or moral capacity to be president. The book is not written to malign Trump but written to show that Trump does not have the emotional stability to lead our country.
This is an extremely readable and frightening look at the state of America by esteemed qualified mental health professionals, attorneys and others with this president “at the helm”. It is well researched, careful and thorough in both historical looks at tyranny, and at how it’s happening right now. It’s also not a diagnosis, rather a complete look at this horrific problem from many sides. Much helpful information is contained, and can perhaps provide a roadmap to drive away from rather than over the cliff. Please read. Our very lives may depend on it.
This was a book that everyone should read. I hope that people pay attention. I am very frightened.
How can anyone look to this man for guidance, he doesn't understand the constitution , has temper tantrums like a 2 year old ! This man has codes that could blow up the world , yet his base thinks he is IT !!!! If he doesn't agree with something its fake news , he is delusional and dangerous , Congress and the Senate have to do their jobs....Paul Ryan needs to do his ! The Republicans need to do their jobs ! He would resign the presidency if impeachment process was to begin...don't even get me started on his horrible public speaking !!! What about his tax returns ? And the power his children have has to be some kind of nepotism ...It is a scary reality we live in .
This is an exceptional book presenting a well-researched case of why this person should not be allowed to lead even a small group of people let alone a whole country that has played a strong leadership role in the world. It is written by smart, ethical, responsible, and courageous professionals. Read it with an open mind and you will believe it. Don't believe the 1 star ratings here as you can see if they cannot write more than few words here to explain why they think this book is bad, you know they have not read it. Read this book and give it as a Holiday gift to every person you know; you will be doing a service to this country and humanity.
Thank you to these leading psychiatrists and psychologists for weighing in on a discussion that should take place before someone is allowed access to that much power. This is a dangerous creature who has figured out (or, more accurately, hired the individuals who have figured out) the buttons to push to achieve loyalty from a disaffected segment of the population who are only getting their news from Fox and social media. The man has point-blank lied, then denied that he done so, when both statements were recorded. The pitiful need to be #1, the best, all the time, for everything, is embarrassing to this country. And it provides a dangerous, simple route for anyone who wants to provoke a response from him. Is there no one in his inner circle who is afraid? Is there no one who he will listed to? Based on his apparent pathology, one would think he could be directed on a better path for no better reason than he is a profound embarrassment to himself. He is a fool, but we are all suffering the consequences. A useful follow-up book would be an attempt to understand these followers who seemingly cannot be convinced of his lies. Rational arguments do not seem to be working. One can have a discussion about conservative vs. liberal ideology with normal people, with each side agreeing to disagree on some points, and negotiate a win-win scenario where each side gets some of what they want. (The Senate used to have a number of these people. Witness the friendship of Ted Kennedy and Orrin Hatch.) But these "true believers" are just merrily marching along. They have drunk the Kool Aid.
Enlightening, both sides clearly presented, easy and quick to read. The best book I have read all year. Not a political book; just a look at behavior and years of knowledge. EVERYONE should read!
This is an excellent, timely, informative, and sobering book. It provides mental health professionals' critical and erudite perspectives on various psychological considerations related to the 45th president. Thanks to Dr. Lee for bringing together these distinguished professionals, and for organizing the Yale Duty To Warn Conference, upon which the book is based, to elucidate relevant psychological matters concerning the presidency at this unique time in history.
Much Needed. An honest and much needed look at a man who is, to any mental health professional, obviously showing disturbing symptoms.
This book validates Trump is a nutter.
I've been a state-licensed psychologist and in practice as well as academia for many years. I fully agree with the other 5-star raters about the immense value of this book. The authors are highly credentialed, and many have had positions in world class educational institutions. They give clear reasons for their opinions in a very scholarly way. As someone very involved in the field of behavioral health and the realm of higher education, I can attest to the outstanding quality of this book. Moreover, the authors, though many are distinguished clinicians and have received high honors at such places as Harvard, Yale, Stanford, etc., write with a clarity that any well-educated high school graduate reader can fully understand. Now, that's intelligent, compassionate and classy! As some other reviewers have noted, anyone who has given this book any less than five stars, let alone only one, must have a horribly stubborn bias or hasn't actually read it or both. (Maybe the 1-star people are those who'd still vote for Trump even after he shot somebody on 5th Avenue, as he boasted would happen--and as yet another example of his mental disorder that he himself generously provided.) Of course, as probably the authors would recognize, denial is always still possible--sadly, especially in this case, for us all!
If you want an eye opener, read The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump. I almost never pay full price for books, but this one I did. It's from a conference about whether shrinks should weigh in on his state of mind (the Goldwater Rule). The case they make is that all we need to know if he is dangerous is the description of his behavior, and that shrinks have a moral and ethical responsibility to warn. So without actually making a diagnosis (although they make it pretty clear what they would be) they make the case that whatever you call it this man is left in power at the world's peril.
Don't waste your time on this one,
a bunch of crap. Donald Trump is the greatest AND most sane president ever!
Easy read; reads like a historical novel, which it sometimes resembles: part fact, part fiction. There are a lot of half-truths in this book, apparently to mislead the reader. Those who dislike Trump will love this book; those who are pro-Trump will dislike it; and those who question many of the assertions of this book will view it more objectively. Many of the comments made are disproved by subsequent events. An index would have helped. The Goldwater rule is mentioned several times. It states that it is unethical for psychiatrists to give a professional opinion about public figures whom they have not examined in person, and from whom they have not obtained concent to discuss their mental health in public statements. The rule was implemented after 1,189 psychiatrists wrote that Barry Goldwater was psychologically unfit to be president, and they were published in Fact magazine in 1964. The magazine editor lost the ensuing lawsuit and the American Psychological Association was embarrassed. Now mental health experts want to disregard their own rule. Judith Herman sent a letter to then president Obama urging him to require that Mr. Trump undergo a neuropsychiatric evaluation before assuming the office of the presidentcy. (No Obama response.) Winston Churchill was not popular in Parliament and many thought him to be something of a joke figure, an egotist. Stands for only one thing: himself, and he changed political parties. Should Churchill have undergone neuropsychiatric evaluationn before becoming Prime Minister? James A. Herb, lawyer, wrote, "for now, Trump is an alleged incapacitated person, and will remain so until there is a determination otherwise." Guilty, until proven innocent. Leonard L. Glass wrote, "Now, it is undoubtably true that mental health professionals are not exempt from bias and that some would speak without due reflection and circumspection...they're human and fallible." Yes, reading this book makes that obvious. This book's recommendation: future presidential and vice presidential candidates should be approved or disapproved by a panel of mental health experts. A panel would then have the power of rejection or at the very least have a strong recommendation to foist off on the voters. They want the removal of this president. Shouldn't the press be responsible for honest researching of all the candidates? I stress honest, as in unbiased and thorough. I'm familiar with many of the people used in this book to help substantiate Trump's unfitness for office; the one's I recognize are anti-Trump. The interview of Bandy Lee on MSNBC by Lawrence O'Donnell that I watched was more prompting than questioning. Dr. Lee refused to be interviewed by Mark Levin on his radio show after first accepting.
This is based on nothing. They never even talked to Donald Trump. Just a bunch of BS.
Get a life! Dont trash trump love him cause hes an overgrown orange!! #theorangemartian
Mental health "professionals" claim to assess an individuals mental condirion without ever meeting him. Unbelievable that a so called professional would attach his or her credentials to this junk. Like watching a commercial where the spokesperson is dressed like a doctor but the fine print says paid spokesperson or actor.
Bunch of garbage