The electrifying new thriller from New York Times bestseller Stephen Hunter takes you deep inside the mind of the most notorious serial killer of all time: Jack the Ripper.
In the fall of 1888, Jack the Ripper slaughtered five prostitutes in London’s seamy Whitechapel District. He did not just kill—he ripped with a butcher’s glee—and then, after the particularly gruesome slaying of Mary Jane Kelly, he disappeared. For 127 years, Jack has haunted the dark corners of our imagination, the paradigm of the psychotic killer. We remember him not only for his crimes, but because, despite one of the biggest dragnets in London history, he was never caught.
I, Ripper is a vivid reimagining of Jack’s personal story entwined with that of an Irish journalist who covered the case, knew the principals, charted the investigation, and at last, stymied, went off in a bold new direction. These two men stalk each other through a city twisted in fear of the madman’s blade, a cat-and-mouse game that brings to life the sounds and smells of the fleshpot tenderloin of Whitechapel and all the lurid acts that fueled the Ripper headlines.
Dripping with intrigue, atmosphere, and diabolical twists, this is a magnificent psychological thriller from perennial New York Times bestseller Stephen Hunter, who the San Francisco Examiner calls “one of the best storytellers of his generation.”
|Product dimensions:||5.00(w) x 5.50(h) x 0.37(d)|
About the Author
Stephen Hunter has written eighteen novels. The retired chief film critic for The Washington Post, where he won the 2003 Pulitzer Prize for Distinguished Criticism, he has also published two collections of film criticism and a nonfiction work, American Gunfight. He lives in Baltimore, Maryland.
Read an Excerpt
August 31, 1888
When I cut the woman’s throat, her eyes betrayed not pain, not fear, but utter confusion. Truly, no creature can understand its own obliteration. Our expectation of death is real but highly theoretical until the moment is upon us and so it was with her.
She knew me but she didn’t know me. I was of a type, and having survived on the streets for years, she’d cultivated the gift of reading for threat or profit, deciding in a second and then acting accordingly. I knew in an instant I’d passed beyond the adjudication and represented, in her narrow rat brain of what once was a mind, the profit, not the threat. She watched me approach, along a dark street that had subtended from a larger thoroughfare, with a kind of expectant resignation. She had no reason to fear, not because violence was rare here in Whitechapel (it was not), but because it was almost always affiliated with robbery, as strong-armed gang members from the Bessarabians or the Hoxton High Rips struck a woman down, yanked her purse free, and dashed away. Crime, for the working population of the streets, meant a snatch-purse with a cosh, and he would be some kind of brute, a sailor most likely, or a large Jew, German, or Irish Paddy with a face like squashed potato. I had none of these defining characteristics but appeared to be some member of a higher order, to suggest service in a household or some low retail position. I even had a smile, so composed was I, and she returned that smile in the dimness of a crescent moon and a far-off gaslight.
I know exactly what she expected; it was a transaction as ancient as the stones of Jerusalem, conducted not merely in quid but drachmas, kopeks, pesos, yen, francs, marks, gold pieces, silver pieces, even chunks of salt, pieces of meat, arrowheads.
“Want a tup, guv’nor?” she’d say.
“I do indeed, madam.”
“It’s a thruppence for what’s below, a fourpenny for me mouth, darling. My, ain’t you a handsome bloke.”
“Jenny in Angel Alley offers her lips for a thruppence flat,” I would dicker.
“Then off to Jenny in Angel Alley and her fine lips, and don’t be bothering me.”
“All right, we’ll rut front to back. A thruppence.”
“Suppose you run?”
“Ask ’em all, Sweetie don’t run. She does what she’s signed for, fair and square.”
“So be it.” And with that the coin would be granted, a niche against the wall found, the position assumed, the skirts lifted, and I was expected to position myself suchways and angled so as to achieve fast entry. The system was not designed to accommodate finesse. Of foreplay, naught. The act itself would resolve into some sliding, some bucking, some in-out–in-out in the wet suction of the woman’s notch, and I’d have a small but reinvigorating event. I’d feel momentary bliss and step back.
“Thank you kindly, sir,” she’d say, “and now Sweetie’s off.”
That would be that—except not this night.
If she had words to speak, she never spoke them, and that half-smile, in memory of a woman’s comeliness, died on her lips.
With my left hand a blur, I clamped hard on her throat, seeing her pupils dilate like exploding suns—that to steady her for the next, which was contained in the strength and power of my stronger right hand. At full whip, I hit her hard with the belly of the blade, the speed, not any press or guidance on my own part, driving the keen edge perfectly and carrying it deep into her, sundering that which lay beneath, then curling around, following the flow of her neck. I hit my target, which Dr. Gray has labeled the inner carotid, shallowly approximated in the outer muscle of the neck, not even an inch deep. It was good Sheffield steel, full flat-ground to the butcher’s preference, my thumb hooked under and hard against the bolster for stability. There was no noise.
She meant to step back and had more or less begun to sway in that direction when I hit her again, the same stroke driven by full muscle, with all the strength in my limb against it, and opened the second wound near perfect upon the first.
Blood does not appear immediately. It seems as if it takes the body a few seconds to realize it has been slain and that it has obligations to the laws of death. She stepped back, and I gripped her shoulder as if we were to waltz, and eased her down, as if she’d just fainted or grown a bit dizzy from too much punch before the spin upon the floor among the lads and lasses.
Meanwhile, the two streaks that marked my work reddened by degrees, but not much, until they each looked like a kind of unartful application of a cosmetic nature, some blur of powder or rouge or lipstick. Then a drip, then a drop, then a rivulet, each snaking slowly from the lip of the cut, leaving a track as it rushed down the tired old neck.
Sweetie—or whatever, I didn’t know—was attempting to say something, but her larynx, though undamaged by the anatomical placement of my strikes, would not cooperate. Only low murmuring sounds came out, and her eyes locked all billiard-ball on infinity, though I do not believe she was yet medically dead, as she had not lost enough blood from her brain as yet.
That issue resolved itself in the next second. The severed artery realized what its interruption required and at that point, at last, begin to spurt massively. Torrent to gush to tidal wave, the blood erupted from the full length of each cut and obeyed gravity in its search for earth in which to lose itself. I laid her down, careful not to let the surge flow upon my hands, even though, like all gentlemen, I wore gloves. In the moonlight—there was a quarter moon above, not much but perhaps just a bit—the liquid was dead black. It had no red at all to it and was quite warm and had a kind of brass-penny stench, metallic, as it rose to meet my nostrils.
She lay supine, and her eyes finally rotated up into their sockets. If there was a moment of passing or an actual rattle, as the silly books claim, I missed it clean. She slid easily enough into a stillness so extreme it could not but be death.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
I can appreciate it when an author gets a bee in his bonnet and has to write about a certain topic just to get it out of his system. Stephen Hunter, ordinarily a great writer, seems to have done that here. This book does not measure up to any of his Bob Swagger books.
Approaching the nineteenth century’s most infamous serial killer in a unique and disquieting manner, Stephen Hunter’s “I, Ripper” pulls out all of the stops to create an incendiary tale of madness and mayhem. The story of those fatal 1888 months comes primarily from two perspectives: that of Jack the Ripper himself and that of a budding Irish journalist who becomes entwined in the killings. Both narrate in the first-person, Jack in diary entries as the events unfold and the journalist after twenty-four years have passed. Occasionally interjected between the two are letters from a prostitute named Mairsian. What results is an unsettling glimpse into London’s underworld and the various possibilities regarding how and why the murders unfolded. Hunter craftily utilizes dualism to achieve what Saucy Jack’s motivations and thought processes may have been as well as how the killings were perceived and even exploited by the news reporters of the day. As a result, this psychological thriller tends to be graphic and at times crude, particularly concerning Jack’s epistolary narrative, but the distinctive viewpoints also serve to shed fresh light on the details of the case, one that continues to shock and intrigue over a century later. And just like the events themselves, “I, Ripper” contains shocking twists and unsettling theories. I received a complimentary copy of this novel from The Reading Room in exchange for an honest review.
Amazing Historical Suspense London, England Jack the Ripper murdered five prostitutes in the fall of 1888 in the seamy Whitechapel District of London. He desecrated with insane glee and not just killed. Then he disappeared after the particularly gruesome slaying of Mary Jane Kelly. Jack has haunted the dark corners of our imagination for 127 years. He is the archetype of the psychotic killer. He was never caught despite one of the biggest dragnets in London history and is remembered not only for his crimes but because he was never caught. With a vivid reimagining of an Irish journalist that covered the case and knew the principals that also charted the investigation and when stymied went in a bold new direction is the telling of Jack’s personal story that entwines with that journalist. In a city twisted in fear of the madman’s blade the two men stalk each other in a cat-and-mouse game that brings to life the sounds and smells of the fleshpot tenderloin of Whitechapel and the lurid acts that fueled the Ripper headlines. This is another theory on Jack the Ripper that manages to really bring the story to life for readers. This book will have readers turning the pages to see how it turns out this time around. The reader is never lost as the perspective switches between the characters of the book. It makes for a story that is hard to put down and takes the reader back in history to the time of reign of Jack the Ripper and all the fear that London felt while he was running loose. This is definitely a book worth checking out for anyone that is interested in the story of Jack the Ripper or in thrillers.
Having read all of Stephen Hunter's books I looked forward to this book. Preordered it and read 10 pages!! Sorry Mr. Hunter your take on the JFK killings was masterful and insightful. Stick to what you do best writing about guns. DON'T SPEND YOUR MONEY OR YOUR TIME ON THIS BOOK.
Horrible. I found it disappointing as I love the middle sniper books and bought the book based on author-trust without preview. Reluctantly continuing for a bit, I bitterly put this book down as it can't touch David Morrell's "Murder as a Fine Art". Shame.
The book was written well but I determined who "Jack" was half way through the book. It's a good read, I liked the ending and it gives a good explication as to what "Jack's" motivation was.